It seems to me that there are an awful lot of parallel characters between Harry Potter and LotR. On of them jumped out at me immediately when I read DH, but there are a lot of others… (cut for spoilers!!!)
HP=LotR
This first one came to me instantly, when I was reading DH:
Neville=Fredegar Bolger (the friend who was left behind to become the leader of the home front resistance)
And this one, fairly obvious, re-occurred to me in a discussion with
surgicalsteel
Dumbledore=Gandalf ( a *lot* like Gandalf--there are a great many things Gandalf and Dumbledore have in common!)
So then
danachan and I were talking on the phone, and we came up with the following:
Harry= both Frodo (self-sacrificial elements) and Aragorn (leadership) combined (both of them were “Chosen Ones” in their own ways, as well)
Ron=Sam (loyal friend) a fairly obvious choice
Hermione=both Merry and Pippin (Merry for long range planning and knowledge and Pippin for intuitive understanding, both of which Hermione excelled at.) (This was
danachan’s thought, and it seemed very appropriate to me.)
Hagrid=Bilbo! ( think about it: the one who comes and rescues the orphan child from an uncomfortable situation, and who loves him very much!) (Also, thought Hagrid could also be Beorn, as well.)
Fred and George=Legolas and Gimli (okay, it’s a bit of a stretch; but I could see Fred and George enjoying the “counting game” at Helm’s Deep! And I could see Legolas and Gimli admiring Fred and George‘s antics in OotP.)
Snape=Boromir (the one who betrays the hero, yet dies a hero himself in the end)
Ginny=Arwen (though Ginny’s a lot more active than Arwen!)
Tonks=Éowyn (Tonks is pretty tough--she’d have made a great shield-maiden)
Trelawney=Ioreth (she spouts a lot of nonsense, but also the truth once in a while!)
Molly Weasley=Rose Cotton (mother figure, and a lot stronger than she appears)
Cornelius Fudge=Denethor (the paranoid politician, afraid that someone is out to get his job! Also, all too willing to use the Enemy‘s methods to defeat the Enemy…)
Remus=Faramir (honorable and wise and misunderstood)
And then after we got off the phone, I thought of these:
Voldemort=Sauron, of course!
Lucius Malfoy=Saruman (though he doesn’t have Saruman’s fate in the end.)
Kreacher=Gollum? (though Kreacher was ultimately redeemed, and Gollum was not.)
Dursleys=Sackville-Baggins (that one’s pretty obvious too, though we never see an Otho as despicable as Vernon.)
Gríma Wormtongue=Peter Pettigrew, Wormtail (that one’s kind of obvious, also)
James and Lily Potter= Drogo and Primula Baggins (also kind of obvious; and if Harry is a combination of Frodo-Aragorn, then I suppose the case could be made they are also Arathorn-Gilraen)
Some we couldn’t figure out:
HP
Sirius
McGonagall (we talked about her possibly being Galadriel, but that’s *really* a stretch, I think, and doesn‘t quite work out)
Luna
Dobby
Draco
Mr. Weasley
Mad-Eye Moody
Cho Chang
LotR
Tom Bombadil and Goldberry
Elrond
Éomer
Théoden
Galadriel
Celeborn
Beregond
Bergil
Gaffer Gamgee
Treebeard
So, really, does anyone think these are valid/invalid or just a long reach? Would you change any of them? Have you thought of any more obvious or less obvious that we missed? None of them are *exact* equivalents, of course--several of them had different fates. Still, it seems that cases could be made for the parallels drawn here.
HP=LotR
This first one came to me instantly, when I was reading DH:
Neville=Fredegar Bolger (the friend who was left behind to become the leader of the home front resistance)
And this one, fairly obvious, re-occurred to me in a discussion with
Dumbledore=Gandalf ( a *lot* like Gandalf--there are a great many things Gandalf and Dumbledore have in common!)
So then
Harry= both Frodo (self-sacrificial elements) and Aragorn (leadership) combined (both of them were “Chosen Ones” in their own ways, as well)
Ron=Sam (loyal friend) a fairly obvious choice
Hermione=both Merry and Pippin (Merry for long range planning and knowledge and Pippin for intuitive understanding, both of which Hermione excelled at.) (This was
Hagrid=Bilbo! ( think about it: the one who comes and rescues the orphan child from an uncomfortable situation, and who loves him very much!) (Also,
Fred and George=Legolas and Gimli (okay, it’s a bit of a stretch; but I could see Fred and George enjoying the “counting game” at Helm’s Deep! And I could see Legolas and Gimli admiring Fred and George‘s antics in OotP.)
Snape=Boromir (the one who betrays the hero, yet dies a hero himself in the end)
Ginny=Arwen (though Ginny’s a lot more active than Arwen!)
Tonks=Éowyn (Tonks is pretty tough--she’d have made a great shield-maiden)
Trelawney=Ioreth (she spouts a lot of nonsense, but also the truth once in a while!)
Molly Weasley=Rose Cotton (mother figure, and a lot stronger than she appears)
Cornelius Fudge=Denethor (the paranoid politician, afraid that someone is out to get his job! Also, all too willing to use the Enemy‘s methods to defeat the Enemy…)
Remus=Faramir (honorable and wise and misunderstood)
And then after we got off the phone, I thought of these:
Voldemort=Sauron, of course!
Lucius Malfoy=Saruman (though he doesn’t have Saruman’s fate in the end.)
Kreacher=Gollum? (though Kreacher was ultimately redeemed, and Gollum was not.)
Dursleys=Sackville-Baggins (that one’s pretty obvious too, though we never see an Otho as despicable as Vernon.)
Gríma Wormtongue=Peter Pettigrew, Wormtail (that one’s kind of obvious, also)
James and Lily Potter= Drogo and Primula Baggins (also kind of obvious; and if Harry is a combination of Frodo-Aragorn, then I suppose the case could be made they are also Arathorn-Gilraen)
Some we couldn’t figure out:
HP
Sirius
McGonagall (we talked about her possibly being Galadriel, but that’s *really* a stretch, I think, and doesn‘t quite work out)
Luna
Dobby
Draco
Mr. Weasley
Mad-Eye Moody
Cho Chang
LotR
Tom Bombadil and Goldberry
Elrond
Éomer
Théoden
Galadriel
Celeborn
Beregond
Bergil
Gaffer Gamgee
Treebeard
So, really, does anyone think these are valid/invalid or just a long reach? Would you change any of them? Have you thought of any more obvious or less obvious that we missed? None of them are *exact* equivalents, of course--several of them had different fates. Still, it seems that cases could be made for the parallels drawn here.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 08:08 pm (UTC)*grin*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 09:02 pm (UTC)The lists go on and on. JK Rowling studied the classics and myth in her college years, and she has done much the same thing in her books as Tolkien did in his (and George Lucas, to a lesser degree did in Star Wars)--she has taken all the archetypes and fashioned a new myth, a new fairy tale, in our own time, right before ours eyes.
This is for me significant; I just find it thrilling. There was a time when I thought all the great stories had been told long ago, back in the Dark and Middle Ages, but what I have found in the last 30 years is that in the hands of genius they can be remade. Or put another way, as Tolkien did, they are all the same story, just going on and on through time with new people and new challenges to face.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:49 am (UTC)Yes, several of the characters *are* composites! I especially think that Harry is *both* Frodo *and* Aragorn.
Like Frodo, he is destined to sacrifice himself in order to achieve the goal of defeating a Dark Lord. And like Aragorn he also needs to accept his destiny as a leader in order to defeat the same Dark Lord.
There are a few who have the genius necessary to use archetypes without turning them into cliched stereotypes--JRRT was one, and so was JKR, though I do not find her quite his equal with language and story, she certainly qualifies in the matter of characterizations and world-building.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 03:40 pm (UTC)I agree that JKR is not Tolkien's equal in language, though you know if she was she would never have succeeded in getting published in the current literary environment. God forbid one should have to think and read at the same time!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 09:18 pm (UTC)Sirius might be Saradoc... the surrogate father/family, the advisor in the background (even though Saradoc was never mentioned as such I still picture him that way). From the advisor side I could also see a connection with Galadriel, though that would be quite a stretch as well.
Draco as Lotho Sackville-Baggins as antagonist and grudger of the hero. Both had turned to the dark side and both learned their lesson in the end.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:51 am (UTC)Draco as Lotho? I must admit, he's more effective in that role than Dudley.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 09:44 pm (UTC)And in reading your entry I got an answer to one of your 'leftovers' based on something I saw when I watched OotP. (A bit movie-verse for LotR here) As I watched OotP I was struck with the similarity between Frodo's (movie) reaction when Gandalf falls into the pit, and Harry's reaction when Sirius falls through the curtain in the Dept of Mysteries (definitely book-verse). They are both stunned, caught up by someone nearby and kept from going after the lost one. So, in this sense, Sirius is both like Gandalf to Harry, in that he provides a source of information and protection, and like Bilbo to him, in that family connection. Even though they aren't related, Harry connects to Sirius as his "family," the one he would choose to live with if he was given his choice.
I like your Snape=Boromir, Remus=Faramir and even your Trelawney=Ioreth comparisons too. I'm just glad that Tolkien didn't kill off Faramir!
Interesting thoughts!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:53 am (UTC)Harry's grief at losing him certainly would resonate with Frodo's grief for Gandalf, but I still think that Dumbledore is much more the Gandalf figure.
I'm glad he didn't as well! As I said, many of them had different fates--I was mainly thinking of their *function* in the story, and in relation to Harry.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-05 04:14 am (UTC)I know, of course, that many icons are not for sharing, so if you don't want me to use it, I will still adore it from afar!
:D
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:35 am (UTC)My friend and I were having a conversation about this very thing last night. I even had the stirrings of an HP/LotR crossover (well, perhaps not a real crossover, but rather one where HP characters discuss LotR characters). But you've delved deeper into different characters and trumped anything I'd have come up with.
Some of the pairings *are* a bit of a stretch, I think, but I had a lot of fun reading your takes on them. I'd be inclined to say that Hagrid is closer to Beorn than Bilbo, perhaps with a bit of Butterbur thrown in -- the caring but clumsy helper. OK, maybe a dash of Bilbo thrown in. ;)
I don't think Harry really has an uncle/father-figure equivalent. If anything, I think the closest thing would be Dumbledore who is already startlingly like Gandalf as he is to Frodo, especially given Deathly Hallows.
Fun! Thanks for this! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 02:37 am (UTC)Sirius Black is Bilbo! Except that he was the Bilbo that wasn't allowed to happen. And he bequeathed his house to Harry just as Bilbo did to Frodo. There you go!
:)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 03:02 am (UTC)After all, if Harry can be two characters in one, no reason Hagrid and Sirius can't combine and make one character into two!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 03:01 am (UTC)In his nature, Hagrid is like Beorn; I was thinking in terms of his relationship to Harry--he *is* the one who took him away from his stressful early life and introduced him to Hogwarts, just as Bilbo took Frodo away from his stressful memories in Buckland and brought him to Bag End. But of course, plot-wise, they do not fill the same function at all.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-30 08:32 am (UTC)*LOL*
I can just picture that!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 04:21 am (UTC)Draco = Lotho?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 08:33 pm (UTC)I do agree with the Freddy=Neville connection.
Can you tell I was less than happy with the final book?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 09:18 pm (UTC)I was not *un*happy with it. But then I did not go into it with any particular hopes or expectations, other than a few vague speculations...JKR's just not the writer JRRT was, but still the books will stand as a very great achievment.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 01:38 am (UTC)The power of the RING Dumbledore wore when he shouldn't have slowly killed him?!
The horcrux on a CHAIN had a nasty effect on those close to Harry and caused Boromir, er, Ron to get nasty and desert Harry in favor of going to the White City, er, Gull Cottage.
Too much of a steal on the horcrux front and then if all else fails, let "The Lady of the Lake" bring you the sword! hehehe
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:20 am (UTC)But it was inevitable, because aside from the fact that it's clear she's read JRRT, they both were educated about some of the same sources in medieval literature.
The idea of a McGuffin that contains the power of the Bad Guy, and can destroy him is as old as dirt.
My main problem with the book was that it was too hectic--it was nearly a non-stop roller coaster ride. That's fine for a movie, but in a 749 page book, you need a breather once in a while! And while I think the deaths of some of the major characters made the story more realistic, I have my doubts that they made it *better*! She promised a "blood bath", which I think was in some ways uncalled for. Yes, characters did need to die--but not necessarily *those* characters, nor *that* many of them! That was something else JRRT knew. Among the Good Guys, Boromir and Theoden die. There were several others as well but not major ones. Having Pippin die at the Black Gate would have been more realistic--but it would *NOT* have made for a better or more satisfying story, as JRRT knew, when he made the decision not to do that.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 04:54 am (UTC)I would have thought too that she wouldn't want a repeat of Harry's childhood but she puts Lupin's child in the very same situation by taking out both parents. I saw no reason for that whole storyline. Harry convinces Lupin not to run off and leave his child, to be there for him and to raise him and then Lupin and Tonks run out on the child in order to fight the great battle. I should have thought that at least one of them would have stayed behind. It makes Harry's talk with Lupin earlier pointless really.
See I had so many issues with this book.
Anyway, I am very glad that Hobbits are so sturdy and that Pippin did not die or even become injured in a lasting way because of his battle with the Troll. The Hobbits went through enough in losing Frodo eventually and coming to grips with the events in the Shire. If they had lost Pippin I think that would have been too much. (It would have been too much for me at least. LOL)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:02 am (UTC)The One Ring - the Horcruxes, the Hallows, and the Invisibility Cloak. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-14 05:17 am (UTC)::will come back when i finish HP7::