Hobbit Month
Oct. 15th, 2009 09:18 am(
ceshaughnessy was unable to get her Hobbit Month entry completed for today, so she asked for someone to fill in for her. I offered to do it, so that I could go ahead and post that portion I could not get completed for my own assigned date.)

The Shire Calendar
One of the most useful and fascinating parts of The Lord of the Rings are the Appendices. The Tale of Years, the Family Trees, notes on languages… all of these things are fodder for the fanfic writer, as well as giving us some of the details that give verisimilitude to Middle-earth and to our stories.
JRRT himself made no use within the story of the calendars he created for his world. He consistently used the modern names of days and months, rather than the less familiar ones he devised. Perhaps he (or his editor) thought that it would be confusing for readers to understand the unusual names. It was probably a wise decision, as first-time readers would have no frame of reference for them. And yet it is a shame to allow the wonderful calendar he created go to waste. In addition, the truth is that there are enough differences between the Shire Calendar and the modern calendar to make it rather inexact to correlate the months (for example, our February has only 28 days except in Leap year, when it has 29. The Shire version of February, Solmath, always has 30 days.)
"The Calendar in the Shire differed in several features from ours. The year no doubt was of the same length, for long ago as those times are now reckoned in years and lives of men, they were not very remote according to the memory of the Earth. It is recorded by the Hobbits that they had no 'week' when they were still a wandering people, and though they had 'months', governed more or less by the Moon, their keeping of dates and calculations of time were vague and insecure. In the westlands of Eriador, when they had begun to settle down. they adopted the King's reckoning of the Dúnedain, which was ultimately of Eldarin origin; but the Hobbits of the Shire introduced several minor alterations. This calendar, or Shire Reckoning' as it was called, was eventually adopted also in Bree, except for the Shire usage of counting as Year 1 the year of the colonization of the Shire". (LotR, Appendix D)
(In making use of Shire Reckoning, for those who usually write using the Númenorean dates, it is simple enough to convert to Shire Reckoning by simply subtracting 1600 (the year of the Third Age in which the Shire was founded) from the relevant Third Age year.)
"The Shire names are set out in the Calendar. It may be noted that Solmath was usually pronounced, and sometimes written Somath. Thrimidge was often written Thrimich (archaically Thrimilch) and Blotmath was pronounced Blodmath or Blommath. In Bree, the names varied, being Frery, Solmath, Rethe, Chithing, Thrimidge, Lithe, The Summerdays, Mede, Wedmath, Harvestmath, Wintring, Blooting, and Yulemath. Frery, Chithing and Yulemath were also used in the Eastfarthing." (LotR, Appendix D)
The calendar I have arranged differs from the one JRRT has in Appendix D only in having the days of the week added for convenience.
"Its [the Yellowskin] earliest entries seem to have begun at least nine hundred years before Frodo's time, and many are cited in the Red Book annals and genealogies. In these, the weekday names appear in archaic forms, of which the following are the oldest: Sterrendei, (2) Sunnendei, (3) Monendei, (4) Trewesdei, (5) Hevensdei, (6) Meresdei, (7) Highdei. In the language of the time of the War of the Ring these had become Sterday, Sunday, Monday, Trewsday, Hevensday (or Hensday), Mersday, Highday.
There are some very elegant and sophisticated elements to the Shire Calendar, that to my own mind make it in many ways superior to the modern calendar in use today. Not only do the years begin and end on the same days of the week each and every year, but the second half of the year begins and ends in the same way as the first half of the year. And each year, the same dates will always fall on the same day of the week, meaning, for example, that Frodo's and Bilbo's birthday will always fall on a Mersday (Thursday).
Using the calendars that JRRT devised is not truly necessary in fanfic, given his own example, but personally I find using the Shire Calendar helps give me the feel of being more immersed in Middle-earth. At any rate, I think it is truly fascinating.
Midsummer's Day
(Overlithe)
I had hoped to add more information to this post, but formatting it has been a bear to say the least. I do hope that it will be informative and useful.

One of the most useful and fascinating parts of The Lord of the Rings are the Appendices. The Tale of Years, the Family Trees, notes on languages… all of these things are fodder for the fanfic writer, as well as giving us some of the details that give verisimilitude to Middle-earth and to our stories.
JRRT himself made no use within the story of the calendars he created for his world. He consistently used the modern names of days and months, rather than the less familiar ones he devised. Perhaps he (or his editor) thought that it would be confusing for readers to understand the unusual names. It was probably a wise decision, as first-time readers would have no frame of reference for them. And yet it is a shame to allow the wonderful calendar he created go to waste. In addition, the truth is that there are enough differences between the Shire Calendar and the modern calendar to make it rather inexact to correlate the months (for example, our February has only 28 days except in Leap year, when it has 29. The Shire version of February, Solmath, always has 30 days.)
"The Calendar in the Shire differed in several features from ours. The year no doubt was of the same length, for long ago as those times are now reckoned in years and lives of men, they were not very remote according to the memory of the Earth. It is recorded by the Hobbits that they had no 'week' when they were still a wandering people, and though they had 'months', governed more or less by the Moon, their keeping of dates and calculations of time were vague and insecure. In the westlands of Eriador, when they had begun to settle down. they adopted the King's reckoning of the Dúnedain, which was ultimately of Eldarin origin; but the Hobbits of the Shire introduced several minor alterations. This calendar, or Shire Reckoning' as it was called, was eventually adopted also in Bree, except for the Shire usage of counting as Year 1 the year of the colonization of the Shire". (LotR, Appendix D)
(In making use of Shire Reckoning, for those who usually write using the Númenorean dates, it is simple enough to convert to Shire Reckoning by simply subtracting 1600 (the year of the Third Age in which the Shire was founded) from the relevant Third Age year.)
"The Shire names are set out in the Calendar. It may be noted that Solmath was usually pronounced, and sometimes written Somath. Thrimidge was often written Thrimich (archaically Thrimilch) and Blotmath was pronounced Blodmath or Blommath. In Bree, the names varied, being Frery, Solmath, Rethe, Chithing, Thrimidge, Lithe, The Summerdays, Mede, Wedmath, Harvestmath, Wintring, Blooting, and Yulemath. Frery, Chithing and Yulemath were also used in the Eastfarthing." (LotR, Appendix D)
The calendar I have arranged differs from the one JRRT has in Appendix D only in having the days of the week added for convenience.
"Its [the Yellowskin] earliest entries seem to have begun at least nine hundred years before Frodo's time, and many are cited in the Red Book annals and genealogies. In these, the weekday names appear in archaic forms, of which the following are the oldest: Sterrendei, (2) Sunnendei, (3) Monendei, (4) Trewesdei, (5) Hevensdei, (6) Meresdei, (7) Highdei. In the language of the time of the War of the Ring these had become Sterday, Sunday, Monday, Trewsday, Hevensday (or Hensday), Mersday, Highday.
There are some very elegant and sophisticated elements to the Shire Calendar, that to my own mind make it in many ways superior to the modern calendar in use today. Not only do the years begin and end on the same days of the week each and every year, but the second half of the year begins and ends in the same way as the first half of the year. And each year, the same dates will always fall on the same day of the week, meaning, for example, that Frodo's and Bilbo's birthday will always fall on a Mersday (Thursday).
Using the calendars that JRRT devised is not truly necessary in fanfic, given his own example, but personally I find using the Shire Calendar helps give me the feel of being more immersed in Middle-earth. At any rate, I think it is truly fascinating.
| Saturday (Sterday) | 2 Yule | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Sunday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Monday | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 |
| Sunday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Monday | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 |
| Sunday | - | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 |
| Monday | - | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Friday (Highday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Saturday (Sterday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Sunday | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Monday | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Sunday | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Monday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 |
| Sunday | - | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 |
| Monday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Friday (Highday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 1 Lithe |
Midsummer's Day
(Overlithe)
Lithe was a three-day holiday most years. It consisted of 1 Lithe, which was the last day of Forelithe, Midsummer's Day (a day which was not part of a month or a week), and 2 Lithe, which was the first day of Afterlithe.
Midsummer's Day
occurred each year, but "Overlithe" only occurred in leap years. The only Overlithe we have a definite year for is SR 1420. Using that date, it is easy enough to figure up and down to other years that would have had the extra Litheday.| Saturday (Sterday | 2 Lithe | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Sunday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Monday | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 |
| Sunday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Monday | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 |
| Sunday | - | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 |
| Monday | - | 5 | 1 2 | 19 | 26 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Friday (Highday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Saturday (Sterday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Sunday | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Monday | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Sunday | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Monday | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | - |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Friday (Highday) | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | - |
| Saturday (Sterday | - | 4 | 11 | 18 | 25 |
| Sunday | - | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 |
| Monday | - | 6 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
| Tuesday (Trewsday) | - | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
| Wednesday (Hensday) | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
| Thursday (Mersday) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
| Friday (Highday) | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 1 Yule |
I had hoped to add more information to this post, but formatting it has been a bear to say the least. I do hope that it will be informative and useful.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 03:44 pm (UTC)One thing that I think odd about the whole business, though--these names themselves had to be "translations"!--considering that they're composed of English elements the same way that "smial" and "mathom" are.
So there's another layer of Westron names out there presumably.
The whole thing makes me rather suspect that this and Appendix F were composed around different times. Considering the way the appendices were rushed to publication it might explain the inconsistency. Unfortunately that's a little fact that rarely lends itself to explanation in fic...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 03:56 pm (UTC)One of the things I wanted to point out was how cleverly JRRT managed to fit "names" that looked and sounded remarkably *like* those we now use into his own legendarium (for example "Trewsday" was intended to have come from "Two Trees Day".
I suspect the same as you, by the way. Some parts of the Appendices appear to have been charted or composed during the writing of his epic, while others seem to be afterthoughts. I think the Family Trees and the Calendar were of the earlier variety.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 07:53 pm (UTC)Gosh, yes! Of course the fact that hobbits would have a "Treesday" (Monday and Sunday make sense, and one of these days I'm going to work the older spellings in there) raises a whole slew of questions as to how much Elvish mythology was actually embedded in their culture, and whether in earlier days when they were in greater contact with the elves they had something closer to the lore we see in such texts as the Silm. Kind of shakes up the interpretations of those of us (like me) who don't like seeing too much of the Silm entering the Shire (i.e., hobbits knowing the names of the Valar). And I'm not complaining!@
I also feel the need to state the extent to which I squeed my pants when I managed to see the LotR stage show and noticed that they worked some of the hobbit weekday names into one song (even though I checked the days against canon afterwards and discovered that they did not keep the right names!).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 08:14 pm (UTC)I do think they might have had some tales of the Fair Folk that could have been vastly changed versions of the originals. But if they did it would have been considered only tales for entertainment, not history. And I don't think that they would have known about the names of the Valar or any of that sort of thing, at least not by the time we get to Bilbo's generation.
Bilbo himself, however, could have brought "new" (as in the old, original) Elven tales home from Rivendell. He had nearly two generations of youngsters he could have regaled with those stories. I am quite sure that he also would have educated Frodo in whatever knowledge he possessed. As to whether that would have gone beyond the two of them (as history and not tales), well, I highly doubt that.
In fact, speculation about that is right down your alley...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 08:36 pm (UTC)Heh heh heh...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 07:08 pm (UTC)Thank you!! Very fascinating contribution to Hobbit Month!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 09:41 pm (UTC)Thanks for posting this.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:19 pm (UTC)The calendars fascinated me from the first time I read them. I didn't notice until just now that I have most of the four hobbits born on Mersday. Of course, Frodo and Sam's birthdays are established in canon, but I picked Thrimidge 25 as Pippin's birthday, which is a Mersday; and I have Merry born on Afteryule 1, and that's a Sunday. Just a piece of trivia for myself that I noticed while reading this.:)
Thank you for all the research you do and all the interesting things you find in the canon material.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:31 pm (UTC)I have a lot of fun digging in the Appendices.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:13 am (UTC)It's a very useful tool as well. Thank you for posting this.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:58 pm (UTC)It really was frustrating-- even using the Rich TExt, I had to completely scrap it and start over more times than I cared to count. But I think it was worth it.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:30 pm (UTC)I've always faked the months in my fic because I would be in the midst of writing and not want to go hunt through the books for the calendar that I vaguely remembered was in the back somewhere. (Maps and family trees, however, were an entirely different matter, for some reason.)
And now here it is! Thank you so very much, and also for the very impressive job of formatting!
*send you a virtual basket of lembas, with the prettiest of posies in it as well*
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-25 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-25 04:53 pm (UTC)And yes, we owe a lot to Christopher's dedication to his father's work! I can't begin to imagine how difficult it must have been at times.