dreamflower: gandalf at bag end (Default)
[personal profile] dreamflower
I just finished a little essay about the use of "fanon" in hobbit-fic, if anyone is interested:



THE VALIDITY OF “FANON” IN HOBBIT FANFIC

All of us are aware to some degree or other, of the presence of certain pervasive ideas that are not found in canon, yet seem to inevitably find their way into most stories of a certain genre. These ideas seem to propagate naturally, and so become memes; the term that has been coined for these memes is “fanon”.

In this essay, I wish to examine seven of the prevalent “fanon” memes found in much “gen” hobbit-fic, as this is the type of story which I read and write most often. I will examine the underlying basis for some of these ideas, and whether or not they seem to be valid.

For the purpose of this essay, the films will be treated as another type of fanfic, and not as canon in themselves. I will also examine the impact of the film versions on “fanon”. If I have a good idea as to where the idea may have originated, I will try to indicate that as well.

All of these memes are those which I have seen used repeatedly in various stories, and which I myself have used from time to time.

(1) After the death of his parents, Frodo Baggins’ guardians in Buckland were Saradoc and Esmeralda Brandybuck. This particular notion is found in a good many of the stories which feature young pre-Quest Frodo. Is there a basis in canon for this idea? While it is never so stated in the books, this is a bit of speculation that has a good grounding in other canon facts. We are told in “A Long Expected Party” that Frodo was brought up after his parents’ deaths in Brandy Hall, where he lived at least until he was twenty or twenty-one years of age. In looking at the Brandybuck family tree in Appendix C we see that his uncle was Rorimac Brandybuck, Master of Buckland. Frodo was the only child of the Master’s youngest sister Primula and her husband Drogo Baggins. Frodo had some other uncles and aunts, according to the family tree: three other uncles--Saradas, Dodinas and Dinodas, and two aunts, Amaranth and Asphodel. We have no information on Amaranth, other than dates of birth and death, so we do not know if she was married or had children. The same applies to Dodinas and Dinodas, except they do not even have dates. Asphodel, however is married and has a son who would have been in his tweens by the time Frodo was born. Saradoc Brandybuck was Rorimac’s son, and Frodo’s first cousin. He and Esmeralda, at the time Frodo’s parents died, were childless. It seems logical then, that the cousin--younger and unencumbered with children of his own, would be a suitable guardian. We know, for example, that Saradoc’s wife was at the Birthday Party (and thus may assume Saradoc was as well) which indicates a certain closeness.

Therefore, this particular “fanon” meme appears to have enough canon evidence to be not only credible and possible but probable as well.

(2)Frodo and Merry were like brothers growing up, until Frodo left Brandy Hall at the age of twenty-one. This particular meme follows on the heels of the first one. If in fact, Merry’s parents were Frodo’s surrogate parents, then it would seem likely that the two of them would form a brother-like bond. It goes a long way toward explaining the deep love and loyalty Merry shows in conspiring to follow his older cousin into danger. Most of the evidence pointing to this is the same as the evidence for number one. It is slightly more subjective, but the canon basis is fairly solid for this one as well.

(3) Pippin Took is musically talented. Although the popularity of this particular meme appears to have originated with Billy Boyd’s brilliant portrayal of Pippin, and most especially his poignant singing of an altered version of “Upon the Hearth” in Lord of the Rings: Return of the King as well as his spirited singing along with Dominic Monaghan as Merry, in a couple of other scenes, there is a small amount of evidence in the book that Pippin may have been somewhat musically inclined. In the chapter “Three is Company” we see him singing in the early morning after the three hobbits have camped. He also appears to initiate the singing when they are walking. And in “A Conspiracy Unmasked” he sings a rather spirited bath-song. Of course, while this *does* indicate he *likes* to sing, there is nothing there to indicate that he is *good* at it, except perhaps the lack of any complaints from his companions. However, in “The Siege of Gondor” we have this exchange: Denethor asks him “…Can you sing?”

“Yes, well, yes, well enough for my own people. But we have no songs for great halls and evil times, lord…”


While it appears, again, to be negative evidence, given the innate modesty of hobbits, for Pippin to admit that he sings “well enough” for his own people, probably would mean he sings more than tolerably well. However, the evidence is not so strong as to constitute a probability. And as for the idea that he can play instruments, it is totally a “fanon” invention, although given a person with musical interests, not an illogical one. But it is not one supported by any evidence from the books.

(4) Frodo Baggins and Pippin Took like to climb trees. This is more or less a fanon invention, with very little canon evidence to back it up. It appears to have originated with Baylor’s excellent story “The Care and Feeding of Hobbits”, as well as with the scene in the extended edition of the movie version of Fellowship of the Ring, in which Frodo is shown sitting in a tree smoking a pipe as he and Sam cross the Shire. Against the notion are the several times stated fact that hobbits do not like and are afraid of, heights, as well as this scene in “Lothlórien”:

Hobbits do not like heights, and do not sleep upstairs, even when they have any stairs. The flet was not at all to their liking as a bedroom. It had no walls, not even a rail; only on one side was there a light plaited screen, which could be moved and fixed in different places according to the wind.

Pippin went on talking for a while. “I hope if I do go to sleep in this bed-loft, that I shan’t roll off,” he said.


There are only three bits of evidence, and very slim at that, to weigh against such statements. One is the oft reiterated notion that Tooks are not like the normal, average hobbit. The other is another scene that takes place in the same chapter, a bit later, as the hobbits cross the Silverlode, by walking across a rope stretched over the stream:

Of the hobbits, Pippin proved the best for he was sure-footed, and he walked over quickly, holding only with one hand…”

This episode is a clear discrepancy, which I have exploited and examined in one of my own stories.

The third bit of evidence, which might possibly account for Frodo’s ability to enjoy tree-climbing was Bilbo’s climb to the top of the tree in the “Flies and Spiders” chapter of The Hobbit. It could be argued that this was his “Tookish” side, and that Frodo might have inherited his affinity. It has to be admitted, that although Bilbo is said not to have had much practice at climbing trees, he seemed to master this one rather quickly, and to enjoy himself a bit when he got to the top: not a possibility for the average hobbit.

Still, the evidence in favor is shaky at best. This meme is more “fanon” than canon.

(5) Hobbits, especially in strange situations and times of danger, like to sleep huddled together. In other words, the famous “hobbitpile”. This fanon meme also appears to have emanated from Baylor’s “Care and Feeding of Hobbits”. It is a charming idea, and given the situation the four hobbits found themselves in on the Quest, not an illogical one. Is there any canon evidence for such a thing?

The best that can be said for this is there is no evidence *against* it. Hobbits *are* described as social creatures in the prologue, as well as being very clannish and family oriented. While this is a good jumping-off point for the idea, it is not enough to make it have any basis in canon. Any evidence *for* the idea is rooted in psychological theory. However, as previously stated, the idea is a charming one, and not likely to go away. And since there is nothing to say it did *not* occur, it does not detract from the source material. It adds a good deal of depth to the characterization of hobbits as a race, and of the four hobbits on the Quest in particular. Nevertheless, it remains purely “fanon”.

(6) Besides Frodo, the other hobbits who went on the Quest also suffered from psychological trauma and related to this, Merry Brandybuck also suffered from an anniversary illness on the date of his helping to kill the Witch-king of Angmar, Chief of the Nazgûl.

We really are not given anything to go on one way or the other on this in canon. JRRT concentrated his story of the effects of the Quest on Frodo. We are told of the facts of what happened with the other three, but we are not really allowed into their heads at this point, except for Sam, just a little.

However, there is one factor that seems to me to speak to this issue: at the end of their lives *all three* hobbits choose to leave the Shire and end their days elsewhere--the implication is that Sam sailed to the Undying Lands, while Merry and Pippin are stated to return to the South to the Kings who held their allegiance, first staying in Rohan until the death of Éomer and then going to Gondor, where they died at some indeterminate date before the death of King Elessar. This speaks to a certain feeling of alienation from the homeland they had loved so well, and would indicate that there were some things they had never quite recovered from.

Add to this the fact that though they are hobbits--a peaceful race unaccustomed to turmoil, they had been exposed to the horrific face of war and evil, had experienced battle and pain, there is no doubt that, in modern terms, they would have suffered at least somewhat from Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome. Not, of course, to the extent that Frodo did, but most certainly to some degree or other.

The idea that Merry would have an anniversary illness is slightly more tenuous. It cannot be dismissed out of hand, for he also was exposed to, and wounded by, the same Enemy as his older cousin.

I would say that this particular meme is an application of logic and psychology, rather than canon. Nevertheless, it seems on the face of it, to be possible; but it remains “fanon“.

(7) There is a psychic link between some or all of the four hobbits who went on the Quest together. This particular example of “fanon” really stretches things. There are only two pieces of canon evidence that give very slim support to this. The first is that some hobbits, most definitely Frodo, and possibly also Pippin do seem to have some sort of psychic ability. Frodo has a number of prescient dreams, beginning even before he left the Shire, and after the Quest, he was frankly clairvoyant, prophesying Sam’s future, for example. Pippin also, on at least two occasions seemed to have a psychic insight: while in captivity by the Uruk-hai, he sensed Aragorn following them, and took the chance to leave the brooch he had been gifted in Lórien, and in Minas Tirith, he sensed against all evidence, that it was Aragorn arriving in the Black Ships of Umbar. He also was able to locate Merry when he was lost in the vast City after the Battle of the Pelannor, though that, admittedly *might* have been sheer luck. However, as we are often reminded by the author, chance plays little part in the world he created.

The second part is the exchange Frodo has with Faramir in “Window on the West”, in which, discussing how Faramir knows Boromir is dead, he quotes an old proverb: “Night oft brings news to near kindred.”, and he then tells Frodo of the vision he had of his dead brother.

While that may appear to be irrelevant to the question of hobbits--Faramir, is after all a Man, and of the Numenorean line--the remarkable thing about the exchange is that Frodo simply accepts it as a given. This saying seems to be known and agreed to by him. That there should be such a link between kin is not a strange notion to him, nor something to scoff at or doubt. This, to me, is far more telling than Faramir’s actual experience.

As to whether this “fanon” idea has enough evidence to give it a probability, I should say not. It does, however have enough evidence to give it credence as a possibility, as long as it is not stretched too far.

There are any number of other “fanon” notions. Those writers who are well-versed in the books, or have been writing for some time may recognize when such a meme has validity in canon or not. The choice of whether to *use* these elements should become a conscious one, and not an unconscious one. Learning to examine such things in the light of original source material should be something one is unafraid to do.

Newer writers, who are recently come to both the books and to fanfic would do well, when they come across ideas that seem familiar, to check with the original material and see whether this is truly so. Again, this is not to say that such notions should not be used--only used with caution.

New ideas about the original stories are part of what fanfiction is all about. If such ideas add to canon without detracting from what is already there, that is all to the good. “Fanon” can add a lot to one’s deeper understanding of the original canon, but it should never be seen as a substitute for canon.

Date: 2005-11-11 03:33 pm (UTC)
shirebound: (Four hobbits - Mucun/Rei)
From: [personal profile] shirebound
Great stuff, Dreamflower! I really enjoyed reading all this.

I contend, though, that *all* the hobbits are -- to differing degrees -- "psychically gifted", since Merry's dream in the house of Tom Bombadil seems to predict the drowning of Isengard, and since all four hobbits had a "vision" of Aragorn wearing the jewel of Elendil when they were outside the Barrow.

Date: 2005-11-11 03:47 pm (UTC)
slightlytookish: John and Gale looking at each other against a blue background (HOBBITS by i_do_not_strut)
From: [personal profile] slightlytookish
This was very interesting! It's fun to see how much fanon has influenced fanfiction. If you ever feel likle writing about those other “fanon” notions *cough* perhaps exploring why Pippin so often is ill *cough* I'd definitely want to read it :)

Date: 2005-11-15 07:31 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Frodo 2)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
Hi, wandering in from [livejournal.com profile] metafandom, and I recall bringing up the bit about Pippin being kind of sickly with [livejournal.com profile] baylorsr after reading through her stuff (or else reading a conversation she'd had with someone else discussing the idea) -- she's put a fair bit of thought into that bit of fanon (and is quite possibly the source) and could tell you where she found canon evidence for it.

Date: 2005-11-11 04:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] voontah.livejournal.com
I am often surprised on re-reading the books at how much the story has grown in my head through my imagination and the influence of fan fiction and the movies. As long as it isn't out of place or character, I enjoy having a little extra to the story in my head.

I think it was last year that I realized that Billy had so completely sold me on a musical Pippin that I couldn't remember whether there was any book back up for it.

Date: 2005-11-11 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abby-normal.livejournal.com
Hey, really cool! I love this! I have an Essays page on my site that I'd love to have this for. With proper links and contact info listed, of course. Pretty please? *bats eyes*

Date: 2005-11-16 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abby-normal.livejournal.com
http://www.lightindarkplaces.net/EssayDreamflower.htm

There it is. Thank you for letting me post it and please let me know if something isn't right.

*smooch*

Date: 2005-11-11 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] budgielover.livejournal.com
This is wonderful, Dreamflower. I love fanon - it enriches and expands our books and our movies, and brings the classic work closer to our hearts. I like the Frodo and other characters WE have created (or modified) much more than the originals - "ours" are more warm-hearted and "hobbity" than the master's creations.

Date: 2005-11-11 06:22 pm (UTC)
shirebound: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shirebound
I agree. I love the more "informal" and "hobbity" world of fanfiction we've all had a hand in creating.

Date: 2005-11-11 06:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maura-underhill.livejournal.com
So neatly summed up, Dreamflower! I've read so much fanfiction that to get at the root of where all this stuff comes from becomes a tangled exercise indeed. Thanks for unravelling it so well! (But I think you could double the length of this without losing any readers, hint hint)

Date: 2005-11-11 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birch-tree.livejournal.com
This is excellent!!!!
I am taking this chance to do something I have meant to do for MONTHS: ask you if it is ok for you if I add you to my flist.
I am in a bit of a hurry now, but I will come back and comment as soon as possible.
:))

Date: 2005-11-12 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birch-tree.livejournal.com
And back I am! :)

It's been very interesting reading your essay, and all the comments to it as well! There are so many creative people in this fandom :)

I don't have really much to add, just a couple of little thoughts maybe.

Regarding Pippin's musical talent, I think most is due to the movies: not just for Pippin's songs, but also because of the little band playing at Bilbo's party, in which Billy Boyd (although not necessarily as Pippin) is playing ;-)
As you said yourself, Peter Jackson's rendition of the book can be considered as a big fanfiction work :))

Your point #6 is the one that I find the most interesting of them all. I have been thinking about these issues a lot myself, and the "psychological trauma" suffered by the other hobbits is probably the theme I enjoy reading the most in fanfic. It is good though that you pointed out how to put things in the right perspective.
I have had the same reaction as Eykar, regarding the reasons behind Merry and Pippin's leaving of the Shire as a result of their bonds of love with people and places outside of their homeland, but I also totally agree with your reply. A great, perfect combination of two different points of view!!

Point #7 is also extremely interesting, but it is difficult ground too...Personally, I have always interpreted Pippin's vision of Aragorn following him and Merry as a kind of hope, giving him the strength not to give up. Only when I started reading fanfic I heard of a different possibility. I still think this evidence -as well as the other ones you and others have noticed- are not on extremely solid ground.
But again, the idea of a sort of more or less psychic link between kin (and between close people in general) to me is really more of a fact. If Tolkien really implied something like that, I can't tell. But I am more inclined to think that he did ;-)

Re: Fanon

Date: 2005-11-11 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eykar.livejournal.com
Good essay. Thanks.

The only point I would take issue with is that the Travellers' all leaving the Shire was the result of traumatic memories. Rather, I think that it illustrates the strength of the bonds of love that they formed during the the most traumatic parts of their lives: For Merry and Pippin, love of Rohan and Gondor, of Eomer, Eowyn. Faramir, Aragorn, and Arwen; for Sam love of Frodo, of Elves, and of the (reflected and preserved) light of Aman. Nor do I think that Frodo's leaving was as simple as a matter of being traumatized, but that is a long discussion. The commonality for all four is that during the quest they all came to know and love people, places and experiences foreign to the Shire, and those loves endured, whether the individual hobbit was able to return to and live long in the Shire or not.

I especially appreciate your discussion of Pippin's strong intuitions. Perhaps these moments have something to do with why I find in his first glimpse of Minas Tirith (at which he cries out) not only a response to its beauty but an overwhelming yet inarticulate sense of having met his destiny.

Is it okay if I link to this?

Date: 2005-11-11 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] topaztook.livejournal.com
As some others have said, I also appreciate the richness and the fun fanon can bring to fanfic as we play at reading and writing in somebody else’s sandbox.

I also particularly appreciate your comment, however, that “new ideas about the original stories are part of what fanfiction is all about.” That, I think, is what can tend to get lost when Fanon Takes Over: there’s a point at which stories which take a different approach to something within canon are actively discouraged because the fan-dom has become so locked into fan-on.

Like you said, I have read, enjoyed and written stories that incorporated some of the examples you mentioned -- but I would also dearly love to see stories that take a different “what if” approach to some of the questions that the conventional wisdom of fanon seems to consider locked into place.

Date: 2005-11-11 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elandulin.livejournal.com
This is a really insightful and helpful essay, Dreamflower—thank you! Very useful!

The one that most often affects me is the one about hobbits and stairs. I have always had trouble visualizing a Great Smials or Brandy Hall that is only one story. They are delved into hills that seem to encompass more verticle space than Hobbiton Hill (which is terraced in at least one of Tolkien's drawings with Bag End occupying only the very top), and I can't imagine a Buck Hill with a single row of windows circling just the bottom, or the great hilly expanse of the Smials being confined to one level—though most certainly Tolkien didn't elaborate on the subject.

David Day has a quite alarming picture of Great Smials in his Hobbit Companion—a real "rabbit warren"! I wouldn't go so far as he does, but if hundreds of hobbits lived in those places, they were either horizontally profound in mass, or the eccentric Tooks and Brandybucks broke ranks and delved UP! I confess, I have endowed both the ancestral manses with staircases—and, on occasion, skylights!

Date: 2005-11-11 09:01 pm (UTC)
sophinisba: Gwen looking sexy from Merlin season 2 promo pics (Default)
From: [personal profile] sophinisba
Thank you so much for writing and posting this. I've come to love the characters so much more through fanfic and I'm really grateful to fanfic authors for all the embellishments they come up with. But I do tend to get confused about what ideas I have from the books, from the movies, and from fanon. It was really interesting to see you tease a few of them out.

Date: 2005-11-11 09:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lindelea1.livejournal.com
I know that I've never been terribly enamoured of the notion that Pippin was a sickly child. My private theory is that people want to cosset and cuddle him.

I compromised by making him a sickly adult, at least for a while.

*g*

Date: 2005-11-11 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rabidsamfan.livejournal.com
Way cool. Me, I think that the "visions" which occur now and then may be part of being a hobbit. Certainly, Rosie knew when Sam had completed the Quest and would come home. On the other hand, that ability may have been JRRT's way of signalling to us that a particular hobbit is somehow special.

Date: 2005-11-12 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fell-beast2.livejournal.com
Very good points.

As for the "hobbitpile" thing - it makes sense that they would sleep huddled together during the Quest, because it was the middle of winter and they had no shelter. Must have been bloody cold.

Beruthiel

Date: 2005-11-12 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gamgeefest.livejournal.com
LOL, you need an eighth one: Frodo can't cook. ^_^

Absolutely no basis for this in canon at all, but it's fun.

Date: 2005-11-12 05:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilybaggins.livejournal.com
This really was fascinating. I've read a general web site on LOTR canon vs. fanon too and it's really amazing how writers have fleshed out the world of Middle-earth.

I think of fanon as icing on the cake, so to speak . . . just more stuff to love. :) And there is fanon in every aspect of LOTR... you should see how much stuff has been created about Aragorn's upbringing! A ton, an absolute ton. Thank goodness, though, that we have the choice to decide what fanon elements to use. I also question whether one fic can be responsible for a fanon . . . because there IS no such thing as an original idea when it comes to LOTR fanfic. Many authors are writing the same thing simultaneously.

Date: 2005-11-19 05:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilybaggins.livejournal.com
Yep, I've had so many fic ideas that I *thought* were original... only to find they'd been done, or were in the process of being done. Or else I sat on them and someone beat me to it!

Funny you mention the guest room for Gandalf, because I remember Febobe using this, for example, in some of her very earliest fics, and then seeing it elsewhere and thinking it seemed very fanon to me!

I guess we just have to write what we enjoy and not worry about where it originated... there's always someone who has thought of it first, it seems. And you know... I remember a writer, long ago, getting very, very upset that someone "stole" an idea of hers. Well... truth was, it was so general that I'd thought of it months earlier, too, but just had never written it.

Date: 2005-11-12 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maripo5a.livejournal.com
I really enjoyed this essay--it was thoughtful and well-researched. I especially liked your conclusions at the end. Food for thought for those of us who have read and re-read the books, and also for those who are newer to bookverse "canon". :-)

Date: 2005-11-12 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elanor1013.livejournal.com
Very nice. I liked your analysis a lot, especially about how writers should be conscious about which things they are using as canon and which are fanon adaptations.

Date: 2005-11-13 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] garnet-took.livejournal.com
Very interesting essay. I have to admit that I have been both encouraged and discouraged by fanon over the years. I had all these ideas when I first read the books, and I wondered if anyone else had the same thoughts. Back then fan fiction was just beginning, and I had no idea that it existed. Now I come across stories that support so many of the ideas I had back then that I feel justified in my imaginings. But, sometimes, I read something, especially by a well known, or very good, author that makes me feel like I'm so far off base that I should scrap any idea I had on the same subject because my idea is so different than that authors that I feel like it won't be accepted, or may even be thought of as over-the-top. Hope this rambling makes sense.

You do give us a lot to think about. If you do write more, or a second essay on this subject, I'll definitely read it.

Also, can I put you on my friends list. I just started my lj, and I don't have many yet.

Thanks.

Date: 2005-11-14 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lily-the-hobbit.livejournal.com
I had not time to read all of this but I will come back on it. Great work indeed!!

Date: 2005-11-16 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ansostuff.livejournal.com
You are so right in bringing this up again. We write without not always thinking if what we write is fanon or canon and when people have been using a certain notion for osme time many take it for canon and doens't chack if it is or not. I do so myself also. The important thing is to know the difference and use the fanon things wisely like you say.

This was really enjoyable reading and I must say you have given this a lot of thought. :)

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 05:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios